Talk:Iðunn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Iðunn has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
April 25, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the Norse people, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Mythology Portal
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology .

This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Pronunciation

How do you pronounce Iðunn? 70.50.173.172 20:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

ð should be pronounced like the voiced 'th' of contemporary English, so it's roughly pronounced like 'Ithoon'. --80.139.217.225 (talk) 04:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sources?

Someone want to give a source that suggests Idunn is an avatar for either Frigg or Frejya? --Trakon 06:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of April 25, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass.
2. Factually accurate?: Pass. This article is very well-referenced, and thoroughly linked to relevant topics.
3. Broad in coverage?: Semi-pass, mentioning more things than the apples and the Poetic Edda and Prose Edda could be beneficial. Western views, or contemporary views, perhaps?
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass.
5. Article stability? Pass.
6. Images?: Strong pass, good work!

There just isn't much to say, a very thorough and enjoyable article. Good work!

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— +Hexagon1 (t) 02:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed it! :bloodofox: (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)