User talk:Hydrostatics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Carlos_Brebbia --Curuxz 10:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

I have replied to your comment, thank you. --Curuxz 13:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for reverting your changes on User:Samthebarth, I was monitoring Recent Changes last night and obviously didn't check what I was reverting - blanking a page is usually vandalism on mainspace pages so I probably didn't notice that it was a user page that I reverted --Careless hx 16:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] One of your comments has been altered

It appears that one of your comments at Talk:Human penis size, made 13:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC), has been altered by meco. 72.76.99.208 19:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your input

Thank you for your input on the Human penis size talk page. You give the recalcitrant editor some good ideas -- if only he would implement some of them. 72.68.123.113 12:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] That silly porn list/table

David, that silly list being pushed for inclusion in the Human penis size article does not belong there, nor does it belong in the Pornography project page. So sourcing is not germane to the issue, as I see it. I will not discuss the matter there. 72.68.123.113 21:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, why do you feel like that? While I agree that the list in its current form has little to no encyclopaedic content, I feel that a compromise, such as a well-written paragraph about fame gathered from penis size, could contriute a lot to the article. Hydrostatics 21:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
A paragraph, or two, short, yes, pointing to a separate article, as has been proposed by, you! But the editor wants to include this cumbersome table/list that consists mainly, or exclusively, of pornstars. The article is about anatomy and sexuality, not pornography. 72.68.123.113 21:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Jasonvieaux.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Jasonvieaux.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 21:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation

Dear Hydrostatics, I accepted to stop my edits in the article because of COI and now I just make suggestions at the discussion page. But User:Athaenara doesn't care about suggested references (reliable and most of them from 3rd party) on the discussion page and places a lot of "citation needed" tags in the article. Also he keeps the boxes on top of the article although the article changed completely and meanwhile HE seems to be the main author. Please get your own picture of that mess and help to make that article a good one (or at least a readable one). Benderson2 10:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)