Talk:Hurricane Fico
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Hurricane Fico has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment. | ||||||||||||||||||||
 |
Hurricane Fico is part of the "Retired Pacific hurricanes" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaiʻi, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Hawaiʻi. Please participate by editing the article Hurricane Fico, or visit the project page for more details. | |
| GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a brief summary at comments to explain the ratings.) |
|
Contents |
[edit] Image
I have a rather interesting predicament here. I have a full-disk image of Hurricanes Fico and Gilma, but I can't remember where I found it. I've searched all over Google but can't refind the image. Any way anyone can help me here? -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 00:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Todo
Better intro, more impact, more pictures. Jdorje 08:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GA Status
This was a well written article and is well referenced. To improve, if it could be expanded in any way it would be good, but other than that all well and good. Jasrocks (talk) 07:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
