Talk:Hurricane Cleo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Hurricane Cleo has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
January 4, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

	Caribbean Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Caribbean, and areas of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

[edit] Todo

The impact section is basically a collection of stubs. The intro mentions nothing of impact. Jdorje 21:02, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

It has been significantly improved. I think I've done all I can with internet sources. Thegreatdr (talk) 06:04, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GAC consideration

It looks good. GAC it if you want. Juliancolton (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Already have two articles I've been working on that are nominated as good articles right now, effects of tropical cyclones and tropical cyclone forecasting. The GAC for this article will have to wait for one of those articles to clearly pass or fail. Past experience has taught me that two articles under review at a time is my upper limit. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

It has been GACed. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 4, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Check

2. Factually accurate?: Check

3. Broad in coverage?: Check

4. Neutral point of view?: Check

5. Article stability? Check

6. Images?: Check

I have made about 13 subsequent edits since my first visit here, all minor—with most being done to grammar, use of ndash, conversion templates and the dablink towards the top which I shortened. Most of these edits were to keep the article consisent. A very good job, and I am willing to pass this article. Well done. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. Rt. 14:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)