Hello, Hoverflysmiles! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking  or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Redmarkviolinist (talk) 17:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)|}
|
Getting started
|
|
|
|
Getting help
|
|
|
|
Policies and guidelines
|
|
|
|
The community
|
|
|
Writing articles
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
|
|
== December 2007 ==
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Antibiotic, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Neparis (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Terminal node. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The redirect that you deleted was valid. Please do not delete it again. You may like to try editing Lymph nodes instead. Thanks. - Neparis (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tunica externa (vessels). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. The first bolded term in the lead of an article should match the title of the article. Please do not change it again. Thanks. - Neparis (talk) 15:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry i dont understand what was wrong.
What i was writing about is a historical and accurace account of the first proper test of distilled antibiotics. Was it badly phrased? Was it historical whereas the artical should have been more scientific? Please tell me what was wrong with it. Thanks.
- Please provide a reliable source for verification of the content you want to add. - Neparis (talk) 15:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
-
- Ok, so if i am to edit something i should ALWAYS do it in sandbox then, and not in the main page? Will this mean that it will be checked and accepted?
- No, if you provide a reliable source for verification of the content you want to add, you can add it yourself to articles. Please read the advice on how to cite sources. Also, please sign your posts by typing four tildes ~~~~ - Neparis (talk) 15:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. I will need to look into more advanced things, such as the terminal nodes article you reverted. Terminal nodes are an important part of the lymphatic system, so i will have to nake that page a disambiguation page. Thanks --Hoverflysmiles (talk) 17:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- That's a very good idea. I hope you won't mind that I created a disambiguation page at terminal node. Please feel free to edit it or to add a description of terminal lymph nodes to lymph node; they are not mentioned there yet. By the way, you can indent your replies (like mine is) by prefacing the start of each new paragraph with one or more colons '::' - Neparis (talk) 17:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
-
- thanks for the advice! i have a nasty exam tomorrow and i will spoft out what i ment to put after that. Thankyou for the help!
- Ok, I hope you do well. - Neparis (talk) 18:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Neoplasmic cells requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) 20:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Tagging with Stub
To tag with a stub, simply add a tag {{stub}} to the article. Your article that I tagged for speedy is too short, so it must be speedily deleted as it does not have much use to the user.
If you have anymore questions, feel free to leave me a message on my Talk Page
The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) 21:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. This subject is covered in a pre-existing article. It would probably better to move this content there and continue to build that article. Dlohcierekim 22:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
|