Talk:Horizon Air

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Should we link to the inflight magazine in the article? I thought we usually left external links to the final section. Is there a different style guideline for the airlines? Jwrosenzweig 20:01, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Splitting destinations into a new article

I don't think this would be a bad idea. The destinations section is getting rather lengthy, and it wouldn't hurt if it had its own section, like lots of other articles have. --Адам12901 Talk 21:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Good idea. I'm all for it.
Jarfingle 22:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree24.20.184.141 03:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I would maybe hold off until all Frontier JetExpress service ends then you can have one article dedicated to solely Horizon Air destinations. Sox23 15:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

I would rather have all the information on one page [as it is right now], in order to save the person who is doing research more time; rather than going on a scavenger hunt for the destinations, everything is clearly listed and can easily be accessed by the reader.

...I agree. Info on one page is easier to access; it's not like QX has dozens and dozens of destinations like NWA/KLM or UA.

...Frontier JetExpress service ended, so I am all for making a new article, because the list is getting quite long, and takes up a bit of space. Plane nerd (talk) 03:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GEG?

I just noticed that recently, Spokane International Airport was listed as a hub. I don't agree. Any thoughts?

Maybe "focus city" would be better. GEG isn't really designed to be a true "hub" but its location makes it a good jumping-off point for several relatively high-load regional runs (see QX route map)....

[edit] Airplane Nicknames

My brother is a pilot at Horizon, and the pilot corps there has given comic nicknames to the three airplanes they fly.

The Bombardier Q-200 is known as the "Weed-Whacker" the 400 as the "Mega-Whacker" and the CRJ-700 as the "Barbie Dream Jet." Perhaps it's not the most informative stuff, but it could add some color to an otherwise bland article. -anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.81.193.106 (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Some of us rampers have come up with several names for aircraft as well: CRJ-700 N290RB "Casper" (Because of its single color white paint job) Bombardier Q400 N425QX as "Skittles" because of it's "Party Plane" livery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krullel (talkcontribs) 00:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Implausible assertions from press release

I removed the section "Services" which was advert-like, and contained the assertion "Horizon is known for being the first regional airline to have flight attendants, food, and a pressurized cabin", which is not even remotely true as regional airlines like Allegheny, Mohawk, and Lake Central flew the Convair 440, Convair 580, and BAC 1-11 in the 1950s-70s, all of which had pressurized cabins, flight attendants, and food. Sorry, but that's a howler. --MCB 07:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:CRJ College Livery.jpg

Image:CRJ College Livery.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Dudes, pics of the new planes are already in. Anybody know how to put in those new pictures> —Preceding unsigned comment added by CrazyHermit (talk • contribs) 22:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)