Talk:Hopak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hopak is within the scope of WikiProject Music genres, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardise music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the project guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good and 1.0 standards.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.


Hopak is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Featured in Classical Dance

в операх "Майская ночь" Римского-Корсакова, "Сорочинская ярмарка" Мусоргского, "Мазепа" Чайковского, "Запорожец за Дунаем" Гулак-Артемовского, "Энеида" Лысенко, в балетах "Конёк-Горбунок" Пуньи, "Тарас Бульба" Соловьева-Седого, "Гаянэ" Хачатуряна, "Маруся Богуславка" Свечникова и др. Название Г. носит одна из частей симфонической картины "Памяти Леси Украинки" Штогаренко.

[edit] More To Come

Needed (or I will get to eventually):

  • The Development of the 3-part hopak
  • More about the shift towards male-focused dancing. This is unique, and the hopak is the dance that led the way.
  • Why is it performed differently by many companies?
  • Aspects of competitive dance.

[edit] Please comment

I've upped the info to move this from start class. Please let me know what else you'd like to see.--tufkaa 00:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Photo

Repositioned picture as banner - has a more dramatic look Bobanni (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The picture isn't really good, and the repositioning messes up the layout of the header paragraph.--tufkaa (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)