Talk:Holophonics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] discussion removed from article

I removed a discussion from the main article, one anonymous writer called Zuccarelli's theory entirely incorrect, another one wrote as a comment to these two words:

Note: While the the theory and its objections seem fairly explained the "(entirely incorrect)" statement seems subjective.

The article states clearly that it's a theory and that two letters in New Scientist question both the theory itself and Zuccarelli's scientific abilities. Maggy Rond 15:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

I removed the reference to "well-known limitations". Even if they are well-known by someone or some group, the information must be verifiable for a wikipedia article. Holon (talk) 13:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

From the article-- "Holophonics should not be confused with holophony..." The link for holophony redirects back to this article, so anyone that does confuse the two will be even more confused. Shayde12301972 (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Fixed it (should have led to holophonic recording), thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Its correct, I have changed the holophonics redirect to wave field synthesis as related topic, also holophonic recording is linked to wfs, which is related to huygens principle as like the optical holography. --Oelwiki (talk) 17:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)