Talk:History of the Nintendo Entertainment System
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Comboy?
I notice that there's a section in the introductory paragraph about the Famicom being released in Korea as the "Comboy." I've not been able to corraborate this: a Google search turns up several entries for the "COMBOY," a scantool (?) for Hyundai cars, and a few more for the "Super Comboy" (a SNES analogue). Does anyone have any verification (and a source, if possible) for this information? Some more release details would be nice, too, of course. – Seancdaug 21:53, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- For some info / pictures / video of the Comboy, check out these links: 1 2. There is not much out there in Korean, let alone in English, but some of these links might give you a start. I've certainly looked. I have seen the Comboy firsthand. I also have several official NES (Comboy) releases, complete. If there's interest, I can take a photo or two. There appears to be a lockout difference in the Korean version of the NES and the US version (the US version doesn't seem to want to boot the Korean games unless the lockout chip is disabled); my theory is that the Comboy might not have a lockout chip, but I'm not sure about that. The Comboy certainly didn't last very long in the Korean market. For 8-bit Nintendo, bootleg famicom seems to have been the de facto standard. Metdugi 09:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removed unverfied claims
I've removed the following two sentences from the article:
- In South Korea, the official licensed version was marketed as the Comboy by Hyundai Electronics, even though the units also contained the Nintendo Entertainment System marking.
- At the height of its popularity, an NES console could be found in more than a third of all households in North America and Japan.
I couldn't find a source supporting either statement. If anyone else can provide such a source, feel free to reinsert them. – Seancdaug 16:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Nesticle.jpg
Image:Nesticle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

