Talk:History of Raël

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article History of Raël was a nominee for good article, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
 WikiProject Religion This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
B This article has been rated as B on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

If this is going to be seperate from Raëlism (and given the size of the two pages, |I guess that's probably a good idea), you might want to add a paragraph or two at the top just saying what Raëlism is and pointing to the other pages. I have a vague idea because I've heard the name before, but I'm not sure how many other people would without reading those pages. Mark Grant 12:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Automated Peer Review

[edit] (cur) (last) 12:50, 4 January 2007 Kmarinas86 (Talk | contribs) (firefox printing issue)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Kmarinas86 19:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] title

Why does "Raël" redirect to "History of Raël" instead of the other way around? "Raël" would be the logical title for this article. wikipediatrix 18:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review

Please see comments at History of Raëlism. I believe that the subject matter of these two articles is rather confusing unless the two articles are merged, as being separate, it creates a severe content fork. Dr. Cash 05:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)