User talk:Hessejicks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Adam Blum Article

==Adam blum== The article you created at Adam blum was eligible for deletion without further discussion under criterion A7 in the criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a real person that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. Since it appears to be about you I've moved it to your user space instead, which was probably what you intended in the first place (a common mistake among newcomers!). If you really did mean to create an article about yourself please be aware that this is often considered a bad idea, even if you do meet the guidelines for inclusion of biographies. I know Wikipedia can be confusing for new editors, so you are welcome to ask for help at the help desk or on my talk page.

I moved the info you put on that page to your personal user page. If I am incorrect in thinking that this you created that page about yourself, please leave a leave a comment on my talk page, thanks! --- by Kpavery (talk) 08:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Adam smiling.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adam smiling.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:S2020152(1).JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:S2020152(1).JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] vanity

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; i doesn't contain vanity articles. See Wikipedia:Vanity for more information.


Agreed. --- Kpavery (talk | contribs) 05:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Poison idea 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Poison idea 2005.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Unikron: On!

A tag has been placed on Unikron: On!, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. richi 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)