Talk:Henry Flitcroft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	Class: This article has not been assigned a class according to the assessment scale.

[edit] Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 23:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Whose "B"? is the real question. One wonders in what cultural context an assessment of "low priority" is rendered, doubtless after great consideration. Is the context "European culture since the Renaissance". Or is it "Neo-Palladianism in Great Britain? To be perfectly honest, shouldn't Henry Flitcroft really be rated "uncool"? One wonders, would the flagger here hesitate for a moment before tagging an opinion in an architecture article WP:NPOV?--Wetman 00:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Assuming that your "real question" is just that, my answer would be the steps listed in the "easy steps" above are not complete and this scale. As to priority, I agree that a change is needed. The guideline I see is High: Must have had a large impact in their main discipline, across a couple of generations. Had some impact outside their country of origin. Mid: Important in their discipline. I will change it to Mid as the article makes no claim to impact outside of his country of origin. Is some further change in order? --KenWalker | Talk 01:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)