User talk:Hbflp07

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Notability of Tactical Girls

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tactical Girls, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tactical Girls seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tactical Girls, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 18:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tactical Girls

A tag has been placed on Tactical Girls, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix_talk 23:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You need to provide reliable sources which discuss the subject other than to point at it and say it exists. That could help to estabish its notability. Corvus cornix_talk 16:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

If there are no reliable sources, then a link could only be considered spamming. Corvus cornix_talk 17:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. Don't discuss how other articles are lacking, discuss what can be done to make the article you're concerned about meet notability requirements. Corvus cornix_talk 21:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)