Talk:Haworth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Haworth is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's assessment scale. See comments for details. |
|
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-Priority on the Project's priority scale. | |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. (Assessment comments) | |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the UK geography WikiProject. | |
I have removed irrelevant (and potentially libellous) 'tourist information'. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a tour guide. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information And as villages go Haworth isn't small.86.129.40.6 16:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Haworth Cat Rescue
Another editor has removed this text from the Haworth article as "blatant advertising" -
<nowicki>Haworth is home to a long established cat rescue centre, which has a policy of not putting a healthy animal to sleep. The centre won an award in 1998 for being the best cat rescue centre in the UK.[1]</nowicki>
It was not my intention for the entry to be a blatant advert. However, I consider that an entry in the article of Haworth Cat Rescue is justified because a) it has been established in excess of 10 years, and b) it has achieved national recognition for the work that is done. Is there any way of rewriting this so that it could be part of the Haworth article? Mjroots (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
