User talk:Hasseniqbal192

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hasseniqbal192.
This is the user talk page for User:Hasseniqbal192, where you can send messages and comments to Hasseniqbal192.

Contents

[edit] Al Hidayah (Organisation)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Al Hidayah (Organisation), by Ultrabias (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Al Hidayah (Organisation) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

blatant advertising, WP:NOTABLE


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Al Hidayah (Organisation), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Al Hidayah (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Next time you vandalize as you did with Fatimah, you will be blocked from editing. KlakSonnTalk 11:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: Comments on my talk page.

Walaikum salam akhi,
I have to say I was a bit shocked by your message to me. Please refrain from comments such as "what is wrong with you," "what is your problem," and "you need to be more open minded". The official Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:Civility policies are relevant here.
As far as me supposedly editing pages in reference to him "in a negative manner" and that he "challenges my point of view" I believe you need to review the [[[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]] behavioral guideline.
In regard to you not letting me or anyone else edit certain pages, I believe you need to review the official Wikipedia:Ownership of articles policy. We are all free to help improve upon this site and it is not for an editor to decide who else is allowed to edit or not.
Now, the meat of the issue, honestly I did not know that. I have never heard of him before you created the article on him, was not aware that the "head of al-Azhar" holds him in such high esteem or that one scholar from Deoband respects him. Obviously he is notable enough to warrant his own article as I have seen the number of books he has authored and his activities in da'wah, but that he is one of "the greatest scholars of this time" is an opinion, and there are a number of present day scholars who have recieved more coverage and thus are more notable, and this goes double for both Br. Tahir and others in regard to the scholars of the past.
In short, I think you should step back for a bit and relax. Nobody is trying to attack the man, we are just trying to keep things neutral. MezzoMezzo 23:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reconsidering

I've done some thinking over the weekend and decided that perhaps I was too flippant with you before. Here are some of the issues at hand.
Template:Muslim scholars in its current state is unorganized and seems to have some odd criteria. I will consent to moving this to its discussion page where we can go down the list of more recent scholars and discuss their notability. What I will need from you are second hand sources of Dr. Qadri's notability - i.e., not from his own website or sites of his organizations. See if you can get me some articles from sources like the BBC, maybe some major Pakistani papers demonstrating how publicly visible he is. After that we need to discuss others on or not on the list as well. I think the main criteria should not be what "school of thought" someone is, but rather their being recognized as having scholarly knowledge in some way. Ayatollah Sistani, for example, is controversial due to his positions but his knowledge is not disputed, so in his case I think he belongs on the list. Hisham Kabbani on the otherhand is disputed knowledge wise and I would argue that he shouldn't be on the list (just using him as one example of someone who is disputed, not attacking the man personally). We should also keep it on that discussion page in case anyone else wants to jump in as well.
In regard to Dr. Qadri's book, my main issue isn't that it isn't notable but rather that it isn't a Secondary source; it is a Tertiary source. It is still a valid source of information but histriographically speaking, it's a different kind of source. I think a review of the terminology on the links I provided there might help.
Please let me know what you think of my suggestions and hopefully we can accomplish more working with one another. MezzoMezzo 16:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, I was short with you as well. I think the best place to put those sources is on the actual talk page for the template, that way other people may see them as well.
In regard tp Dr. Qadri's collection of hadith, it may be a non-issue because I put another suggestion on the talk page for the list of sunni texts page. The page sort of just looks like a big long list to me and may be better at a category than a page. As for the template on hadith collections, while it's newer than the others it's still a hadith collection with its own article so in retrospect I think I may have been too short with deleting it before. MezzoMezzo 16:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] help needed

i need ur Help in Maintaining truth on WIKI pages related to sufism and sunniyat . Like Barelwi page on which vandalism is always caused by MEZZO MEZZO .Msoamu 17:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not accuse good-faith edits of being vandalism Msoamu, as this is a violation of both the Wikipedia:No personal attacks policy and the Wikipedia:Assume good faith behavioral guideline. Hassen, I am sorry that this user is now harassing you about this as well. MezzoMezzo 19:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Muslim scholars template

I added Dr. Qadri and did some other work in the way of adding birthdates, putting scholars in chronological order, etc. Let me know what you think. For the hadith collections template, I think we should be able to knock that one out soon as well inshaAllah. Get back to me when you get the chance. MezzoMezzo 03:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, if you're ok with its current version I guess it's good to go. If not, just make any changes you feel would improve it. As far as placing it on the pages for individual scholars, that's a formatting thing that needs to be looked at for each article. Some of them might have other templates that could make the page bloated; i'm still learning about this myself so your guess is as good as mine. The Manual of Style has a lot of information that can help. MezzoMezzo 18:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Faridfather.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Faridfather.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism at Islam

Please do not vandalize wikipedia, like you did at Islam. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Arrow740 21:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

How dare you accuse me of vandalism, I removed un-needed, biased and quite incorrect information from the Islam page and you cannot ever block me in any way no matter how hard you try. Hasseniqbal192 11:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Help

As You edit some part of Mawlid Page plz help in making Consensus that it is celebrated in most of the Muslim Countries.You are also requested to give Your remarks hopefully they will be Positive regarding the headings about ifferent Countriies here[1].plz help .Shabiha 20:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MuhammadinSKY.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MuhammadinSKY.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Use of Shaykh Abdel Hakim Murad photo

Asalaam Alaikum.

My university Islamic society is going to be hosting a talk by Shaykh Abdel Hakim Murad. Can I possibly use the photo you uploaded of him for publicity purposes?

Jazak'Allah. (No profits will be made from the talk or the use of your photo)M2k41 20:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm so Sorry for my late reply as I have been quite Ill for a month and have been away from the computer. Of course you can use the photograph for advertising your event and publicity purposes. I hope your event is successful. Ma'sallaamaHasseniqbal192 11:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MuhammadinSKY.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MuhammadinSKY.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MuhammadinSKY.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MuhammadinSKY.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Help, please

Greetings Hasseniqbal192 ,

Could you kindly help me translate these passages into the brilliant and unique Urdu language? Please.


"Water baptism is the sacrament for the remission of sins and for regeneration. The baptism takes place in natural living water, such as the river, sea, or spring. The Baptist, whom had already received baptism of water and the Holy Spirit, conducts the baptism in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. And the person receiving the baptism must be completely immersed in water with head bowed and face downward".
"The sacrament of feet washing enables one to have a part with the Lord Jesus. It also serves as a constant reminder that one should have love, holiness, humility, forgiveness and service. Every person who has received water baptism should have their feet washed in the name of Jesus Christ. Mutual feet washing is practiced whenever is appropriate".
"The Sabbath day, the seventh day of the week (Saturday), is a Holy Day, blessed and sanctified by God. It is to be observed under the Lord's grace for the commemoration of God's creation and salvation and with the hope of eternal rest in the life to come".


Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated. (just try your best effort) --Phillip J (talk) 08:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kind Words

Salaam brother. jazak'Allah for your kind words, it seems from some of the posts later down on your talk page you talk to the entire world as though you are a supreme being.

Once again, please read the personal attacks and civility policies, or how about actually attending a real Sunni gathering and hearing what the REAL, AUTHORISED, SUNNI scholars have to say on the topic of character.

www.dawateislami.net

Fi'iman il Llah wa Rasuli —Preceding unsigned comment added by MuhammadYusufAttari (talk • contribs) 20:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Faridfather.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Faridfather.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 13:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC)