Talk:Harmonic analysis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See note on Talk:Pontryagin duality on plans for this page, probably to be implemented in the next week. AndrewKepert 01:15, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
[edit] Merging with Fourier Analysis
Whether or not this page is going to be merged with fourier analysis, please note that the article for Non-sinusoidal waveforms has a link that says "Fourier Analysis" but is actually a link to "Harmonic Analysis"
- It seems appropriate to keep harmonic analysis separate from fourier analysis. Although they have a significant overlap, harmonic analysis could also include wavelet analysis and other generalized representations. Willem 23:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] External links
| Find more about Mathematics on Wikipedia's sister projects: | |
|---|---|
| Dictionary definitions | |
| Textbooks | |
| Quotations | |
| Source texts | |
| Images and media | |
| News stories | |
| Learning resources | |
- Download the freeware program Harmo 1.0 [1] with source in Delphi.
It's not spam link, it's a program that I developed about Harmonic Analysis and I think it could be useful for anyone interested in implementation using Delphi or any other programming language.User:Prof.Maque 19:48, 8 august 2007 (UTC)
- So, you're using a Wikipedia article to promote your own program? Ah. And there's no way of knowing its actual function without first downloading it. Sorry, but I'm not convinced it belongs here. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 20:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I have no commercial interest since I'm not a professional programmer. My intention is to help those that, like me, had a hard time to translate the theoretical books to a practical implementation. Anyone that decides to download a program knows the risks involved. If you persist with your opinion I will not continue undoing because, as I said, I'm have no selfish interest on this. Please reconsider. Thank you. User:Prof.Maque 20:38, 8 august 2007 (UTC)
- The guidelines on advertising extend to non-profit cases. I'm sorry, but as it stands, I remain unconvinced it benefits or is appropriate to the article. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 20:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

