User talk:Hanskarlperez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Hanskarlperez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  King Lopez 11:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Changes

Before you start editing a page, read the discussion pages illustrating why the page has been changed to its current format. CP Guy

[edit] Getxo

Hi Hans. It looks like you are a rather new user to wikipedia. In this regard, please note that you just can not revert to a previous version without explaining your reasons, specially if the newer version you are reverting back has been supported in the edit summary or in the talk page, like in the Getxo case.

So please use the talk page to explain why you think the ANV claim belongs to a table which shows the actual number of councilors obtained by different parties.

Have a good day, --Mountolive | Talk 19:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Hanskarlperez, you did the same thing on Basque language, when you put back text that I reverted for a good reason. You need to be able to back up your claims with a reliable source. And what does "oldest language" even mean? Are you implying that the ancestors of Basque speakers were writing poetry while the ancestors of English speakers could only grunt and point? It's a nonsensical claim. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 06:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop making the leader post field messy. They have and will be reverted.

[edit] Warning: 3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Húsönd 12:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Regardless of whether you are wrong or right, you may not engage in an edit war and try to enforce your changes more than 3 times a day. This rule applies to all users. Please use the article's talk page to talk your disagreements. Thank you. Húsönd 13:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] United States Casualties of War

What is the reason behind adding the presidents and their parties to the chart? I really feel such a major change needs to be discussed. Czolgolz (talk) 14:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Would you be offended if I removed that section? I think someone is trying to make a political point. By the way, thank you for diligently updating the casualties section. Czolgolz (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, and I'm sorry to have deleted all your hard work. Czolgolz (talk) 15:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)