Talk:Hank Hanegraaff/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I was thouroughly enjoying reading about Mr.Hannegraff until I got to the contreversy section (please excuse my spelling, it is not my strong point). What a BIASED piece of .....well trash. ALthough I do appreciate the effort on the part of the author to show numerous examples of controversy in his past, it reads like a 5th grade essay with grammerical mistakes (ie- "Who know their doctrines so good")with no where near enough references and personal opinions muddying up the reading. It is too long and focuses way to much on the writers opinion and not the facts. You dont need to say 10 times that he doesnt mention other peoples books when they are better (why would he, he wants to sell his own). Not to mentin the fact that the writers claim that the donations and praise were asked for has no citation whatsoever. grrr. I am fuming and i hope that someone corrects this soon. Clarinetlaj (talk) 03:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)