Talk:Hampus Hellekant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	The article on Hampus Hellekant is supported by WikiProject Sweden, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Contents 1 Slander 2 New name 3 Slander 4 Slander 5 To Hampus Hellekant

[edit] Slander

The article was serious slander. Statements about crimes never comitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.231.19 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Slander? What would you claim to be not true? Everything has been confirmed by many independent sources apart from the Swedish courts themselves. --Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New name

What is the reason for including his new name in the Wikipedia article? Ulner (talk) 23:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

I didn't get any answer to my question, and have hence deleted his new name from the article. Ulner 19:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Is there any reason to not include his new name? Jobjörn (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I can find no reason not to publish his new name. It shall remain.--Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Slander

Wikipedia is not for slander. Since nobody objected I edited the article. For full discussion se swedish wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.10.143.118 (talk) 13:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree that Wikipedia shouldn't be used for slander. This however is as far away from slander as can be. --Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Slander

Article contains statements about convictions that are not true. It also contains emotional descriptions that does not belong in a encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.10.143.118 (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Just because you keep repeating it doesn't make it so. It's slanderous that you insist on this being slanderous.--Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] To Hampus Hellekant

I have requested deletion of the article twice [1][2]; to no avail, even though I asked the admin to reconsider and explained the situation. I have also requested Wikipedia:Oversight to delete my revisions. Plrk (talk) 11:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

The votes are in and they are not in your favor, the facts are facts and can not be removed just because you for dim reasons wish it so.--Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)