Talk:Gyalpo Sum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Buddhism This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Gyalpo Sum, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Don't support anything written by Nat Krause who's a sectarian fanatic. Sakya never called the spirit Dorje Shugden (which is honorific). It's a ghost and Krause is a fanatical sectarian on an agenda. I want this to be clear that I'm in no way supportive or even faintly sympathetic to any of his mad rantings. I started this article but now denounce all the corrections made afterwards by hostile people. Geir Smith 18:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, the article as it stands does not say that Sakyas call him Dorje Shugden. However, if you tell me what they do call him, I will add that to the article. Is it "Dolgyal"? - Nat Krause(Talk!) 19:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Dol.rgyal is one name in use, but I don't think it's unique to the Sa.skya.pas. An even more pejorative name is Dam.sri Dol.rgyal. RandomCritic 22:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, I'll leave the question of the name up to RandomCritic, as he seems to know something about it, unlike me. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 23:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
and Geir, could we maybe do this without personal attacks? Calling someone a sectarian fanatic is fairly histrionic and inflammatory. Thanks. Zero sharp 20:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)