Talk:Guru Har Krishan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikiproject_Sikhism This article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article Guru Har Krishan, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Not quite sure if the transliteration in Devanagari is correct (actually I'm pretty certain it's wrong). Please can someone double check it for me. Sukh 13:57, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Neutrality

Made changes to remove the use of "Ji" which is not really proper for an encyclopedia. The use of the term indicates a degree of respect or affection which is not appropriate for a neutral source of information. All other articles in this group need this edit as well. Also thousands of people being cured by a blessing is not simply a statement of fact but is part of Sikh history and legend. Verifying this outside of that context is not possible and so should not be presented as simple historical fact.

Actually I disagree. Please sign your comments so I know who I'm talking to. "Sri Guru Har Krishan Ji" can be considered the full title of the Guru so this should be stated to begin with and then the guru should be referred to as Guru Har Krishan, or Har Krishan thereafter. It's on the same line as Pope_Benedict_XVI being called His Holiness. "Sri Guru Har Krishan Ji" is what Sikhs call him "officially".
However, I agree that the rest of the article needs the formalities removed. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 7 July 2005 09:51 (UTC)

[edit] Redirect

I think "Har Krishan" should redirect to this article... currently there isn't an article of that name, so does anyone want to make one, or shall I do it?--J.a.f.a.c. 04:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Done! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 12:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] A Picture is worth Quite a few words

I see that the other Gurus have some pictures on them - why not this one? Just a thought :

MrASingh 21:22, 05 March 2007 (UTC)