Talk:Guanaco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED by Bkonrad per discussion below. The templates are {{subst:polltop}} and {{subst:pollbottom}}, by the way. -GTBacchus(talk) 08:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
Guanaco (animal) → Guanaco – Primary meaning of the term Yath 06:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Speedy support per nom. Duja 12:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Strong support per nom.--Húsönd 18:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support. No-brainer. --SigPig 19:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support km5 16:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
I was bold and went ahead and moved the page since there is little doubt that the animal is the primary topic. But I'm not familiar with the templates used to close RM discussions. older ≠ wiser 15:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] half billion guanacos?
"When the Europeans first arrived in South America, there were an estimated half billion guanacos..." This seems unlikely. Vandalism?212.149.186.77 18:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

