Talk:Gridley Bryant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gridley Bryant was a good article, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Delisted version: April 14, 2007

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

	Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject.

[edit] Liverpool and Manchester vs. Stockton and Darlington

Why the comparison with the Liverpool and Manchester Railway? The Stockton and Darlington Railway opened to steam traffic in September 1825, a full year before. Lumos3 22:13, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The comparison is because that's the way it was mentioned in one of the references. I suppose that if we look further, we may find that he had contacted L&M engineers about the logistics, but don't know yet. slambo 00:16, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article Review

This article is currently at Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 05:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

It has now been delisted per concensus. LuciferMorgan 01:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 16:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)