Talk:Gregory S. Paul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Religion

I've changed the last part of the Writing section, to make it clear that Paul's paper did not suggest what the previous edit said it did. I quoted the paper itself to prove this point. For an extended discussion of the study, I wrote an article in the recent Skeptic's Magazine about the study, entitled Religious Belief and Societal Health.

I modified this further. If the previous edit was in error, it's point does not deserve to be addressed at all.Dinoguy2 01:44, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I split out the section, rewrote it, and replaced the inline links with notes and end refs. I didn't add any new content, but I did add two {{fact}} tags because criticism should be sourced (Jensen's paper doesn't qualify; the only publication of Paul's that he references is Beyond Humanity 1996, not the paper being discussed). | Pat 04:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

This is ridiculous, the section addressing the paper does not even summarize or explain the paper, but goes directly into the criticism of it. Some neutral point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.186.171.17 (talk) 04:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)