Talk:Green-baiting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is extremely biased to one viewpoint, makes claims that are subjective and generalize large groups of people (e.g. "the green movement has become far more a secular religion"), all with no citation. It also seems to involve some logical fallacy (false dilemmas -- "Since the advocates of many green philosophies are not open to reason they then must be subject to ridicule", etc). The article seems to be attempting to making points of its own, which could be classified as "original research" except for the lack of research. It uses non encyclopedic language (e.g. "... bring the true green into a frothing irrational seizure").

I think that the point of view expressed in this article is important to have, but it seems nothing in the article meets guidelines. I don't see the article as being salvageable, and I don't care enough to rewrite it myself.

209.253.177.190 (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)