User talk:Grablife
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Exotic Erotic Ball
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Exotic Erotic Ball, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.KenWalker | Talk 16:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kate's Law
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kate's Law, by Goldenrowley (talk ยท contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kate's Law fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kate's Law, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Kate's Law itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:51022033.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:51022033.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Simon Speed (talk) 23:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
