User:Gonzo fan2007/Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Links

[edit] Total (edits from first to 13:57, June 4, 2008)

Report for User:RyRy5
User groups:
Edits (including deleted edits): 12542
Edits: 11886
Action Counts
Accounts created: 1
Pages moved: 23
Pages moved over redirect: 1
Pages patrolled: 210

Automated or script-assisted edits!
Edits using WP:TWINKLE: 5
Edits using Popups: 329
Total automated or assisted edits: 334

Namespace counts!
Namespace       Count   Percent
Main            3206    26.97%
Talk            258     2.17%
User            1994    16.78%
User talk       5039    42.39%
Wikipedia       1250    10.52%
Wikipedia talk  40      0.34%
Image           1       0.01%
Template        66      0.56%
Template talk   22      0.19%
Help talk       1       0.01%
Category        4       0.03%
Portal          5       0.04%

Blocked = No

[edit] Overview

These comments are just from me looking at your edit count, your logs, and the tools I listed under "Links."

Positives
  • You are definitely dedicated, with around a 3000 edit per month rate. Dedication is a good thing to have for the project.
  • You have over 1000 edits to the Wikipedia namespace, which shows you are involved in areas of administering the website.
  • You have created 20 articles, and have expanded some more. Of course, building an encyclopedia is the key here, so article building is good.
  • You have over 3000 edits to the main namespace, which again shows your willingness to work in the core area of the encyclopedia, whether it be article building, copyediting, or vandalism control.
  • You definitely have a willingness to communicate, which is key for any editor, especially administrators.
  • You have patrolled 210 articles, which shows your willingness not to tag every new page with a deletion tag, and your willingness to help out with NewPages.
  • You have extensive work at the Help desk, with 159 edits to that page. Keep this up!! Helping fellow Wikipedians, or just people in general is key to Wikipedia. We are here not for ourselves, but for the benefit of our readers. Also, administrators must be willing and able to answer many types of questions.
  • You have very few automated edits, which show you care enough to check each edit.
  • Your edit summary is almost 100% since you started editing.
  • You are involved in a lot of projects that help to foster togetherness of the community.
Negatives
  • With 5039 edits to the user talk namespace, which is 42% of all your edits, may make you seem like your using Wikipedia too much just to talk. You are definitely getting better, which I elaborate on below. Just remember, there are other ways to communicate, such as email or IRC. I would say any comments that aren't directly related to Wikipedia should go through another channel. Just my opinion.
  • You have made a lot of edits in a short amount of time. Now this is not a bad thing per se, especially since you have very few automated edits compared to how many edits you do have. But I do want to stress that the key is quality, not quantity. Both are appreciated though, I would just focus on making a big edit every once in a while. Add a paragraph to an article, copyedit it, etc. You are doing well here, I just want to stress how important it is.
  • Try and expand your on-wiki horizon. Do you have any good photos that could be used on Wikipedia? Do you enjoy template work? Instead of communicating on user pages, try and give your opinion on other talk pages, such as Wikipedia talk pages or article talk pages. Check out some of the noticeboards and see where there are debates, and give your opinion. Find some bad articles that seem to be edited frequently and review the article and put some suggestions on the talk page.
  • You have little to no edits in the Wikipedia namespace that are geared towards article building. Maybe try and review a list at WP:FLC, or an article at WP:FA, WP:GA, or WP:PR.
  • You have a heck of a lot of edits to your own userspace. This can be good if it is your sandbox or something like that, but you seem to focus too much on making things look good in your user space. I would shy away from that. You seem to enjoy making user pages look nice, so like you said on my talk page, focus on making other's look good, which will show again a willingness to help others.
  • You have a lot of edits to 2 users talk pages. Again, shy away from communicating with just a few people on-wiki. If you want to chat, try some other channel. Also, get to know people. The more people you know who respect you, the better your Wiki-reputation will be, which means you are gaining the community's trust.
  • Try and focus on one WikiProject. Find one you really like and try and contribute to that one. Like with me, I am in a few WikiProjects, but I only really edit for WP:PACKERS, and I have done a lot to expand that WikiProject. Focusing on one thing makes it easier to expand that area. Its like putting too much on your plate, its hard to finish everything, and your better off focusing your effort on just one thing.

[edit] Last 500 edits (01:24, May 31, 2008 – 13:57, June 4, 2008)

Namespace       Count   Percent
Main            215     43.00%
Talk            10      2.00%
User            50      10.00%
User talk       176     35.20%
Wikipedia       35      7.00%
Wikipedia talk  13      2.60%
Category        1       0.20%

Edit summary = 100% 
Blocked = No

[edit] Overview

Positives
  • You have increased your mainspace contributions from 27% to 43% of your total edits. Good job!!!
  • You have decreased your user talk edits from 42% to 35%, again good job!! I would like to see that even lower, like 25-30%, but not a big deal. I would say if you are between 25-35% you are doing good.
  • You have decreased your user namespace edits from 17% to 10%. Great job! Keep that right around 10-15% and you are doing fine.
  • Edit summary = 100%, keep that up.
Negatives
  • Wikipedia namespace dropped from 10% to 7%, not a biggie, but if you aspire to be an admin, you need to show that you are familiar with that namespace. Remember though, quality over quantity.
  • Try and move some of your talk convos to article talk pages and especially Wikipedia talk pages. The key with Wikipedia talk pages is that is where most of the discussion to change policy, etc. goes on. This is key for any admin, to know the changes in policy and what's happening in that area.
  • Again, try and expand your horizon, try finding a group of articles that could use a navigation template and create one!! This helps our readers a lot.

[edit] In depth review

Positive
  • Copyediting:[1][2][3][4][5]
  • Reference work:[6]
  • Welcoming:[7]
  • Adding/updating WikiProject banners:[8]
  • Warning user with proper templates: [9] Too many examples to list, good work here, users must be warned. Also remember sometimes a handwritten message works even better, especially for those editors who are not exactly malicious.
  • Help desk:[10]
  • Asking questions in RfA's is good [11]
  • There is plenty of stuff you are doing well.
Negative
  • Remember to focus on big edits, using the preview button. You made a lot of edits to Camp Rock and Manny Ramirez in a short period of time. Most of these could have been combined.
  • Try and focus on articles. Tell yourself for one week "do nothing but expand articles."
  • After that, try and find an administrative area you enjoy, and focus on that. WP:AFD, WP:RFPP, WP:AIV, never be wary of giving your opinion on others requests or administrative actions. But focus on a few areas and contribute there. Make your self an expert.
Deleted contribs
  • Everything seems fine here, you have tagged pages properly. You may be interested in WP:FRIENDLY. This is like TWINKLE, but it helps to add cleanup tags and welcome messages to pages.
  • Not that I see anything, because I don't, I just want to stress do not be overzealous on speedy tags. If in doubt Prod the article, then AFD. This is paramount.

[edit] Suggestions

  • Keep up the good work.
  • Keep on communicating, but focus on communicating in different areas. If you start discussing an article with someone else, don't be wary to move the discussion to the article's talk page. This allows a bigger audience to comment on the discussion.
  • Focus on some key discussions. See {{Cent}} for some major discussions going on. Always try and give your opinion where you think you can add something to the conversation.
  • Focus on one or two articles, and try and get them up to WP:GA or WP:FA standards. There is also WP:FL that you could work on. You seem to enjoy sports, and there are a lot of sports lists, so Im sure you could get some up to featured status.
  • Help admins. Give your opinion in key areas, on project pages and their talk pages.
  • WP:AN and WP:AN/I are always good places for discussions, but focus on the discussion and don't get caught up in the dramaz!! lol
  • Don't get blocked!!!! :)
  • Always be ready to admit you are wrong, when you go on-wiki leave any ego you may have. A recent example of this can be found on my talk page here. Basically I deleted an image that was a duplicate on Wikimedia Commons. The problem was that I did not realize that the two photos had different titles, thus when I deleted the photo on the English Wikipedia, the photo was not replaced from Commons. Thus the photo was removed from the article. This was brought to my attention by another editor, and instead of debating, I just apologized and focused on not making that mistake again. The key here is not to get into stupid debates, and to always be ready to admit you were wrong, even if you really weren't. Sometimes a huge Wiki-drama could have been avoided if one editor would have just dropped it.
  • Globalize your account if you haven't already. WP:SUL

[edit] Closing statements

Thats about it RyRy5, all I can say is always be ready to learn from your peers, continue to work on building the encyclopedia, never be rude or uncivil, and strive to be the best editor you can be. Always think before making an edit, will this edit help Wikipedia? The answer should always be yes. If you always feel your edits are doing good, then you are probably doing good. Even if you do make a mistake, most editors will realize your intentions were good, and if you are willing to admit your wrong, then you will gain respect here. My talk page and inbox are always open, so if you ever have any questions, feel free to prod me. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 22:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)