Talk:Golden billion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a common concept, an article is needed. Thus it's not a candidate for speedy at all! Paranoid 23:47, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I agree, and have removed the speedy--but still think it's biased. Sorry. Terrace4 23:59, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) 06:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Golden billion → The golden billion – to be more consistent with the rules of the English grammar (the term seems to be a direct translation from Russian) Crocodealer 09:42, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Oppose: no need for "the" in title. Thumbelina 17:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments
I'm not completely sure whether the definite article must be used here. I'm not a native English speaker, so native speakers are invited to comment.
See also: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name)
Crocodealer 10:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
