Talk:Goldbach's weak conjecture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I propose to simplify this sentence:
K. Borodzin proved that 314,348,907 is an upper bound for the threshold that determines if a number is large.
to:
K. Borodzin proved that 314,348,907 is large enough.
It is fully understandable within context. With this sentence everybody will understand that it is pointless to use larger number (because 314,348,907 is large enough) as a threshold that determines if a number is large - so it is natural that this number is an upper bound for the threshold.
and this sentence:
In 2002 Liu Ming-Chit and Wang Tian-Ze lowered this upper bound to approximately 101346.
to:
In 2002 Liu Ming-Chit and Wang Tian-Ze lowered this treshold to approximately 101346.
CoperNick 10:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. Remember h in threshold if you make the edit. PrimeHunter 00:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

