Talk:Goldbach's weak conjecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Mathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics.
Mathematics rating: Stub Class Low Priority  Field: Number theory
Please update this rating as the article progresses, or if the rating is inaccurate. Please also add comments to suggest improvements to the article.


I propose to simplify this sentence:

K. Borodzin proved that 314,348,907 is an upper bound for the threshold that determines if a number is large.

to:

K. Borodzin proved that 314,348,907 is large enough.

It is fully understandable within context. With this sentence everybody will understand that it is pointless to use larger number (because 314,348,907 is large enough) as a threshold that determines if a number is large - so it is natural that this number is an upper bound for the threshold.

and this sentence:

In 2002 Liu Ming-Chit and Wang Tian-Ze lowered this upper bound to approximately 101346.

to:

In 2002 Liu Ming-Chit and Wang Tian-Ze lowered this treshold to approximately 101346.

CoperNick 10:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Remember h in threshold if you make the edit. PrimeHunter 00:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)