Talk:GodTube

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Christianity Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Sources

Looks like more articles have been published about this website. Will work on this soon. Jinxmchue 06:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Just a bit of discussion

I don't understand the tendency of so many modern Christians to want or need to isolate themselves so hard from the rest of reality. I know YouTube is full of pornography and all, but is it really worth a Christian-only video-sharing site? Christianity is supposed to be a living religion, taking part in the world, not running away from it. Just a little bit from someone considering converting... 76.90.141.94 12:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

The Talk pages are for discussing the articles only, not the subject of the article. Please refrain from forum-type comments like this one -- even if it is a very good question.  ;p Thanks! --Jaysweet 16:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I just want to say that Godtube isn't as tolerant as this article says. I posted a very respectful comment providing a proper, scientific definition of evolution, and it was immediately removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.128.166.131 (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

If you can find coverage of such incidents on respectable media, then we could include them in the article. Otherwise, there is no way to include it. Brusegadi (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I just had a similar experience, and I didn't even dispute the contents, I just questioned whether harsh language regarding homosexuals and others was the best way to make an unrelated point about a given bible passage. Rather disappointing. I expect that respectable media coverage will happen before too long. --24.119.143.142 (talk) 08:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)