Image talk:Godelproof.gif
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Correctness of Duplication
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't Axiom 1 be:
It seems that we're closing a non-opened square bracket. Since this is a quite famous result, and since I'm not entirely familiar with logical notation (though I don't see this happen anywhere else in the proof), I'm apprehensive about changing this on my own. Error792 07:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Shouldn't it be P(ψ) (i.e., lowercase psi)? Isn't this axiom saying: if phi(x) implies psi(x), and phi is positive, then psi is positive? --Taejo|대조 20:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right, I capitalized the psi by accident. Error792 03:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Proof
In wiki notation:
Ax. 1. ![\bullet\; \forall x \lbrace [\varphi(x) \rightarrow \psi(x)] \land P(\varphi)] \rightarrow P(\Psi)\rbrace](../../../../math/c/0/f/c0fe55b6033a525ad256f56b4c5acd20.png)
Ax. 2. 
Th. 1. ![P(\varphi) \rightarrow \Diamond\; \exists x\; [\varphi(x)]](../../../../math/3/4/6/346f978cf8fe0dcff903ed3108914ec0.png)
Df. 1. ![G(x) \leftrightarrow \forall \varphi[P(\varphi) \rightarrow \varphi(x)]](../../../../math/9/d/c/9dcbf33bf48a2fb78044da03be41a032.png)
Ax. 3. P(G)
Th. 2. 
Df. 2. ![\varphi\;\mathrm{ess}\;x \leftrightarrow \varphi(x) \land \forall\psi\lbrace\psi(x) \rightarrow \bullet\; \forall x[\varphi(x) \rightarrow \psi(x)]\rbrace](../../../../math/3/8/f/38f8b54562f250cfcea37ac485cdf2bd.png)
Ax. 4. 
Th. 3. 
Df. 3. ![E(x) \leftrightarrow \forall \varphi[\varphi\;\mathrm{ess}\;x \rightarrow \bullet\; \exists x\; \varphi(x)]](../../../../math/7/b/0/7b0da761347f56ee6ff302aaaee36b7c.png)
Ax. 5. P(E)
Th. 4. 
![\bullet\; \forall x \lbrace [\varphi(x) \rightarrow \psi(x)] \land P(\varphi){\color{Red}\rbrace} \rightarrow P(\Psi)\rbrace](../../../../math/e/e/7/ee7f35f30a00178a90fd851c9c584fed.png)

