Talk:Glucose-6-phosphate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Chemistry Portal Glucose-6-phosphate is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
	This article is also supported by WikiProject Chemistry.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	MCB Portal This article is within the scope of the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. To participate, visit the WikiProject for more information. The WikiProject's current monthly collaboration is focused on improving Restriction enzyme.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article is on a subject of Mid-importance within molecular and cellular biology.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

added the fates of glucose 6 phosphate. didn't touch much on regulation or the specifics

[edit] About the Glucose-6-P properties

Hiya! I've seen the template used for this article, and I must say it's a great help... for other compunds. Why? I don't think that the G6P does have a flash point, or maybe it's impossible to find it at the moment. Shouldn't there be a template for compunds like this? All the properties from the sections "phase behavior", "safety", and solid/liquid/gas properties should be removed as they are unknown, possibly impossible to be known and of inaplicabble (or none) use. --^A_n^d_y^c_y^c_a|say... 01:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Assessment

I've given this a B, not sure if it's quite up to B standard since I don't know how much more detail the 'perfect' article would have. Feel free to adjust as necessary. Richard001 00:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)