User talk:GlenPeterson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] License tagging for Image:Aquilegia canadensis flower close-up.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aquilegia canadensis flower close-up.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi, you wrote on the image description page, "This image may be used for educational purposes so long as a photo credit is given. Please contact me if you wish to use it for a non-educational purpose." Unfortunately, this is not a free license and this image may not be used on Wikipedia except under fair use conditions, and given our fair use criteria, we would not be able to use it at all. If you are unwilling to release it to the public domain or use a Creative Commons License (Attribution or Attribution-ShareAlike only), then I will have to reluctantly nominate it for deletion. Regards, howcheng {chat} 16:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

For example, I can easily replace your wonderful image with a free use one from [1], but I like yours better. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 16:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External links

Thanks for all of your contributions. It looks like you have really been helpful to the quality related articles. I noticed that you have used http://qualitygurus.com/ as a reference or external link a few times. Every article I have ever found on this website is a direct copy and paste from another website. It may be a convient source, but I'd suggest tracking down the original information when possible (usually pretty easy to do since the website often cites where the material was copied from.) Good luck. Nposs 03:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IoC and XSL

Hi, could you perhaps clear up your mention of XSL you give in See Also? It seems interesting, but is really hard to parse in its current form. mathrick 22:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)