Talk:Glenrothes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Glenrothes has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 |
Glenrothes is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| A | This article has been rated as A-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
|
WikiProject Scotland To-do:
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] Infobox
Does anyone know how to change the Vehicle Code on the Infobox? Glenrothes falls under the Dundee and Edinburgh Vehicle Licence codes, not Glasgow.
[edit] Town Centre & Shopping
The Glenrothes Co-op is in jeopardy of closing their store, due to a fixed lease on the property, which was revealed in a local paper[citation needed]. The lease is expected to run out in 2007, which will see a significant change at the top end of the Kingdom Centre.
Thomson, again yes, you are partially correct. Co-Op is to close its Department store at Lyon Square in February. The future of the foodstore at Marchmont Gate is not yet known? I think it would be prudent to remove the above quoted until we learn more about what is happening? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.27.12.185 (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC).
The Lease for the Co-Op Supermarket at Marchmont Gate has been advertised showing that the Co-Op may close in or around 2008/2009 whenever planning is approved for the Sainsburys/Asda apps . 82.41.137.136 12:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC) The Glenrothes Spoon Meister
well thank you for having faith in my judgment (most people on here don't). i know from reading the Fife Herald about the co-op, but i thought it was both stores in the centre and i knew that the co-op were going to give up on their site in Marchmont Gate at a certain time although now overdue.
i wonder what will fill the co-op site on Lyon Square, i was fortunate to go inside and have a look before it closed. it's got lots of potential.
personally (as a person from neighbouring Kirkcaldy) i can't see two new supermarket chains working in Glenrothes, Morrisons is enough and it will kill the butchers and bakers they do have and make the situation worse. most of the orgin of the town is predominately working class from nearby former coal mining areas like Lochgelly and it seriously shows in the shopping centre. ASDA will catch on, but i think Sainsbury's is "wrong" for the town including the fact it will be bigger than their successful store in Kirkcaldy.
i know of a case in Dundee where the combo Jewson/Homebase store behind Kings Way West Retail Park was guaranteed to be a success and it was closed of a sudden. Homebase closed both their previous branches so they could move into this new unit. it doesn't mean to say, Sainsbury's won't do a u-turn in Glenrothes if it decides it isn't working, they are quite capable of closing branches and i think Glenrothes is rather out of the way concerning road access if you don't know where you're going when you reach Bankhead Roundabout from the south or Preston Roundabout from the north. i know it is going out of topic, but thought you like to know my own opinion of the town centre development impact in Glenrothes.
in my opinion, maybe it would be better if both town centres were downgraded to an extent to encourage more independant stores/cafes/ butchers and bakers and a new shopping park including an anchor M&S store complete with a couple of retail stores like Top Man Top Shop, Borders and one or two fast food outlets including a multiplex cinema, bowling alley and ice arena with a bus station terminal and railway station built somewhere down that Kirkcaldy East/Glenrothes road (A92) with good road access from both towns. i am also in support of another road being built to Glenrothes from Kirkcaldy from the west end coming out near the Warout roundabout. these towns are going to join together and both towns should set aside their differences and work together, not encourage town rivarly and fife council should except this. 80.192.80.184 (talk) 04:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tourist Ad
There have now been a number of good green lit developments for Glenrothes town centre including -
The Asda Retail Park which is to house - ASDA first scottish eco-store , NEXT , BHS , H&M , River Island , Superdrug , Body Shop , TopShop and a of couple unconfirmed stores.
The Old Co-Op Re-development - A 60,000 sq ft 3 storey structure . (20,000sq ft ground floor leisure which is hinted at being a cinema , and 2 levels of retail)
The Sainsburys development - A 65,000sq ft Sainsburys along with 7 large stores and 8 level multi storey car park . ( Which means the demolition of the Ciswo , YMCA and Glenrothes House)
South Street Ciswo/YMCA - Development - This was approved last week meaning that work can begin in the summer on tearing down the old crap buildings and putting new 21st century buildings up.
[edit] Town Centre & Shopping
Removed list of shops as it is unencyclopedic info. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mcwesty (talk • contribs) 12:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC).
There have now been a number of good green lit developments for Glenrothes town centre including -
The Asda Retail Park which is to house - ASDA first scottish eco-store , NEXT , BHS , H&M , River Island , Superdrug , Body Shop , TopShop and a of couple unconfirmed stores.
The Old Co-Op Re-development - A 60,000 sq ft 3 storey structure . (20,000sq ft ground floor leisure which is hinted at being a cinema , and 2 levels of retail)
The Sainsburys development - A 65,000sq ft Sainsburys along with 7 large stores and 8 level multi storey car park . ( Which means the demolition of the Ciswo , YMCA and Glenrothes House)
South Street Ciswo/YMCA - Development - This was approved last week meaning that work can begin in the summer on tearing down the old crap buildings and putting new 21st century buildings up.
oh i knew they were probably thinking about opening a cinema in Glenrothes. i just feel like Marvin the Martian "you've made me so angry" Kilnburn (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WP:SCO assessment
First of all, this is a fine article, and with a few adjustments should certainly sail through GA if you were so inspired. It is certainly not far off an ‘A’ class. Here are my comments, with those I think are particularly important marked with >.
*Lead – should link to Fife and mention something from every major section. >Thus if transport, education and worship are worthy of a section, the lead should say something about it. Why around ‘40,000’ when there is a more accurate number in the infobox? Can you substantiate ‘The town is well known…’? Changes made
History - Thornton is linked lower down – its best to link to other articles when they first appear.
‘The name Rothes comes from the association with the north-east Scotland Earl of Rothes, family name Leslie, who owned much of the land historically and after whom the largest local settlement Leslie, pre-Glenrothes New Town, was named, and still exists to the north-west of the town.’ This is a clumsy and over-long sentence. Changes made
>‘In hindsight the loss of the pit can be seen as a blessing in disguise given the demise of Britian's coal mining industry by Margaret Thatcher's Government in the 1970's/80's. The pit's closure did however help change the fortunes of the town for the better.’ Why was it a blessing? There's a typo and it's a clumsy sentence. A British reader would guess, but others may not be sure what you mean. ‘However’ is redundant. Changes made
* GDC ‘480,692 sq m’. There is a protocol about putting horrid little markers between the number and the descriptor. See for example St Kilda, Scotland#Geography.
‘ The winding up of the GDC meant that Glenrothes was no longer an official new town.’ “Official’ is a little hackneyed – 'designated' might be better. Done
>* References – The article begins with (Ferguson 1996) style and then moves on to in-line. I believe this should be consistent and I much prefer the latter. Later on the are lots of examples where the inline ref marker comes before the punctuation e.g. ‘to a min of 9°c [2].’ This is incorrect. Changes made
* Today – ‘two of which (at the time) won Saltire Society Awards.’ 'At the time' is redundant. Is ‘Marching Hippos’ a title? In which case it should be Marching Hippos. Ditto Irises lower down. I don’t believe ‘pleasant modernity' needs to be in quotes and italics. (check with WP:MOS). Done
* Geography – should Warout ridge hve a capital R? The temperatures should certainly have a capital C. Done
>>Housing precinct list. See WP:EL Lots and lots of other examples of this need fixing. Fixed
>*Demographics – ‘Detailed information about Glenrothes from the Census can be obtained from this Executive website.’ This should be a footnote. Changed
* Shopping. ‘which contain their own local newsagents.’ Not really worth saying. Removed
* Industry ‘Manufacturing and the Public Administration, Education and Health sectors’ should not be capitalised. Done
I doubt caps are needed in 'Glenrothes is the Administrative Centre for Fife'. This is also a duplicate of information in 'Background'
* Landmarks - 'As already mentioned Glenrothes is home to a large number of artworks' Unless it was in the lead why is it mentioned again? Changed
'Two other gateway landmarks, located just outside Glenrothes, are also worthy of mention.' That's an unnecessary statement of opinion. Suggest 'There are two other gateway landmarks, located just outside Glenrothes.' Changed
*Media: Suggest: Glenrothes has a weekly newspaper, the "Glenrothes Gazette" which is operated by the Fife Free Press group, and which is published every Wednesday. Changed
'McLeish's resignation in 2001.' Resignation from what? Added further details
* Education - 'creative arts' is an odd red link. Changed
*Kirks - ' St. Columba's was designed by architects Wheeler & Sproson' We know already! point taken and removed
I've looked at it using two browsers and the co-ords are running over the top of one another at top left.
The most important stuff is the WP:EL. "External links should not be used in the body of an article". To be honest, I don't think you need list every estate and precinct anyway.
Hope that's helpful Ben MacDui (Talk) 19:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
There was a request for a further review at WP:SCO. There has of course been significant progress, but a few items still need attention.
- 1)
"References – The article begins with (Ferguson 1996) style and then moves on to in-line. I believe this should be consistent and I much prefer the latter. Later on the are lots of examples where the inline ref marker comes before the punctuation e.g. ‘to a min of 9°c [2].’ This is incorrect." In short, the referencing style at the beginning should be consistent with that at the end, and the spaces between the in-line ref tags and the text should be removed.Changes made - 2)'Administrative Centre for Fife' still appears under 'Industry'. This is its third appearance, and a local authority is not generally considered to be a Changes maden 'industry'. I have attempted an improved version.
- 3) The co-ords are still running over the top of one another at top left. Not sure how this can be changed...?
- 4)
I didn't notice before, but the sub-sections in the External links make the TOC over-long. The could simply be split up using bold rather than sub-section headers.
I also think you the article would benefit by attempting GA status - you would probably get a more objective non-native eye looking over it. Ben MacDui (Talk) 08:39, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Good work. My only final comment is that there should not be a space between the period and the ref marker, but at least the usage is consistent. Well done. Ben MacDui (Talk) 09:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Auto Peer Review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
- Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to a separate page, like Gallery of Glenrothes.[?]
- Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 5 miles, use 5 miles, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 5 miles.[?] - Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.[?]
- Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]
- Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
- Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[?]
- This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.[?]
- There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
- Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
Allpigs are pink, so we thought ofa number ofways to turn them green.”
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
- As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Ben MacDui (Talk) 07:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Balbirnie, Glenrothes
Ok, just to set the records straight on this.
Balbirnie Park & Golf Course and Balbirnie House Hotel both actually fall within the Glenrothes town boundary, not Markinch. Albeit it is confusing that you have to pass into Markinch before entering the main entrance to the park. Balbirnie Estate fell under the designated area for Glenrothes New Town in the 1948 plan.
The Glenrothes Development Corporation bought the land and house off of the Balfour family in the 1960's and developed it into the park and golf course. The GDC also occupied Balbirnie House at one point to prevent it falling into total disrepair and spent quite a bit of money on converting it for office use. Had this not been done Balbirnie House may have been weather damaged and made derelict beyond repair.
Housing which has been developed on the edges of the park, at Tofthill and Mount Frost officially fall within Glenrothes also.
The Glenrothes Area Local Plan proposals map identifies the boundaries of Markinch and Glenrothes if proof is needed. Balbirnie officialy falls within Glenrothes. Glenrothes Local Plan Proposals Map
I hope this clarifies the matter.
