Talk:Giuseppe Sermonti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
This article is supported by the Intelligent design WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to Intelligent design-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Ah yes, more fair and evenhanded treatment of anyone who dissents with a naturalistic paradigm. That 'psuedo' suffix played a starring role in this wiki-entry on Giuseppe Sermonti. If you want information on him, go elsewhere. Many of the wiki-authors are more concerned about their agendas than actually giving fair treatment to someone who disagrees with their worldview. --Jorge Kluney.

[edit] Italian version

I'm going to translate from Giuseppe Sermonti's italian version, because here there aren't a lot of things about him. Can anybody help me, please?

[edit] Not a Creationist

Just because someone is anti-evolutionary does not mean he/she is a creationist. Sermonti is a good example of this. I would like to point out that he says he is not a creationist. "For the reservations I harbor about Evolutionism, I have been accused of being a Creationist. I am not: if I am allowed, I would only aspire to being a creature." —Preceding unsigned comment added by IronCrow (talkcontribs) 02:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Source? Guettarda (talk) 05:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Why would you need a source? You do not have a source to say he is a creationist, you have a quote saying he isn't. It's stereotyping to state that anyone who is not an evolutionist is a creationist. That's like saying just because some guy is a Christian, he can't be an anarchist. I myself is an example (I do not believe in evolution, but I do not believe in creationsm in those terms either). Second, he already stated he is not a creationist, "For the reservations I harbor about Evolutionism, I have been accused of being a Creationist. I am not: if I am allowed, I would only aspire to being a creature," which is already in the article. And if you need a source stated ID is not creationist, then check the Creation, Intelligent Design, and related articles. Or look here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/01/28/do2803.xml Also, might I add, check the Antievolution article, which states: "Anti-evolution is a term for systems of thought, scientific or non-scientific, which argue that the biological theory of evolution is inaccurate. The term applies to most forms of design philosophy, Lamarckism, creationism, animal spiritualism, and any other ways of thinking denying or proposing alternatives to evolution." IronCrow 06:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)