Talk:Girdle book

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Girdle book article.

Article policies
Christianity This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Did You Know An entry from Girdle book appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 12 December 2006.
Wikipedia

[edit] German wikipedia

Based on translate.google.com, the German wikipedia version of this article is superior, indeed better than anything I can find on the web anywhere in English. In addition the Dansk version contains a lot of good material on specific Girdle Books. I don't speak German, and google translate is not good enough to translate directly - if someone who reads German would like to translate the article, it would be a big help as there is nothing on the web anywhere in English at the moment as good. -- Stbalbach 14:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Number of girdle books

There are hundreds of artistic representations of girdle books, but only 26 medieval girdle books have survived in their original binding, the oldest datable example being from Kastl, Germany (ca. 1453)

The source mentioned says that the number is 23 and as far as I know that's correct. I do not know however if Margit J. Smith have discovered further girdle books in her documentation project. I assume that it's the same 23 I've listed in the Danish article but I don't know since a German contact never delivered an article by Ursula Bruckner where they are listed. And a couple of those I've listed seem to have been lost. --Heelgrasper 05:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

26 must have been my typo, thanks for seeing and correcting. BTW I think both the German and Danish versions of the article are better if your interested in doing a translation. -- Stbalbach 15:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)