User talk:Gijones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello from Nick

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello, Gijones, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and ask your question here. Again, welcome! ~ thesublime514 • talk • sign 22:52, July 1, 2007 (UTC)

Is that you, PAUL JONES?Ryoung122 06:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi Paul, want to get back in touch? Call me (404)803-2045.

Thanks Robert Young Ryoung122 06:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Hallo, Paul! Phoenix yp of old; amusing (but not surprising) to see you on here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.250.80 (talk) 08:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding local church controversies

Hi,

There are few things in my consideration to write to you specifically. I have noticed that you are one of those people who are not from the local church movement but are more factual than biased. I was thinking and praying at the same time to work on the article "local church controversies" with you. It would be good if you'll be available to monitor my work and edits and giving the article a NPOV. However, there are few things I would like to share/discuss with you, 1) Some of controversy items should be removed which are kind of outdated, defaming and attacking in nature, and irrelevant to the present local churches; and which has no application, importance, and place in today's local churches around the world. 2) The history of controversy section is a fully biased and laded with anti-local church them and therefore should be removed. If you think some of the things should be kept from there, plese write them in the form of paragraphs and then put back. 3) Few things about daystar issue, and witness lee's involvement in the lawsuits are not factual and are not true, so please be very careful and present everything with a citation and not just a citation form some critics website. Let all the citations should be either from press or published books with NPOV. Let me know what do you think and I will start editing this article soon. Thanks.HopeChrist (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)