Talk:Ghost net
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Seeing as this has an ecological bent, should it go under a biology stub? Also, the POV is pretty apparent. Edit: Oceanography's even better. --DNicholls 00:05, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Technology or something of this kind? Pavel Vozenilek 01:49, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
-
- It does look like oceanography is the most comprehensive for it, although there's that technological side. It should definitely be under the ecology category, as well. --DNicholls 02:39, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
The term ghost net is a lay terminology for what is generally described as marine debris, or more specifically derelict fishing gear.
this is also a article that only is focused on one point of veiw. DxMxD 19:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] POV tag
While this article still needs work, it does not seem to me that it still has serious POV problems. I propose removing the tag in a few days unless there are objections. --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Citations needed
This article makes several bold claims regarding these nets (nearly invisible, have killed humans...) that lack citation. Geronimo20, please stop removing Fact tags UNLESS you insert a citation that verifies the tagged passage. You mustn't remove these tags just because you don't like them - Wikipedia requires sources for what's to be included in it. Alvis (talk) 05:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

