Template talk:GFDL-1.2-en

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:GFDL-1.2-en is permanently protected from editing, as it is a heavily used or visible template.

Substantial changes should be proposed here, and made by administrators if the proposal is uncontroversial, or has been discussed and is supported by consensus. Use {{editprotected}} to attract the attention of an administrator in such cases.
Any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes, categories or interwiki links.

Contents

[edit] Sharp GNU Head

I have uploaded a different version of the GNU Head logo which doesn’t look blurry after downscaling, like the one used currently:

old→GNU head GNU head←new

Image:The GNU logo.png just have to be changed to Image:Heckert GNU white.svg but I don’t have privileges to do it myself. Please see Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags#Sharp GNU Head. Rafał Pocztarski 05:43, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

It has already been changed by Quadell. Thanks. Rafał Pocztarski 05:51, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

is the better option as far as commons is concerned. I'm just wandering around replacing the other GNU heads with it right now. Janizary 02:42, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Please replace such an icon to the template. Thank you, adnghiem501 09:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GNU head at all

Shouldn't there be a GNU head just like in the GFDL tag? Jonas Olson 21:20, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Looks like this was the reason[1] They put the image back in the GFDL tag, but they forgot about this one. *waves to get admin's attention* Phoenix-forgotten 19:26, 2005 May 8 (UTC)

[edit] Interwiki link to vi:

Please add an interwiki link to the Vietnamese version of this template:

[[vi:Tiêu bản:GFDL 1.2]]

Thanks.

 – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 01:46, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

An admin forgot to add this interwiki link to the template. -- ADNghiem501 13:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Done.--Commander Keane 00:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No other versions

Do we really need to explicitly state "no other versions"? It's kind of obvious and it would look sleeker without it. Bromskloss 13:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes. Usually the license states "or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation" So it helps to make it explicit. Pengo 23:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image replacement

Please replace it with This one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.178.151.123 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC-8)

Done.--Commander Keane 17:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Imbox standardization

Please change the template code to the following for purposes for {{Imbox}} standardization. Kelly hi! 00:20, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

{{imbox
| type      = license
| image     = [[Image:Heckert GNU white.svg|52px|GFDL]]
| text      = 
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the '''[[Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation License]]''', Version 1.2 and no other versions published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. Subject to [[Wikipedia:general disclaimer|disclaimers]].
}}{{image other 
| [[Category:GFDL images with disclaimers|{{PAGENAME}}]] 
}}{{free media}}<noinclude>

{{pp-template|small=yes}}
{{Documentation}}
<!-- Add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage, not here! -->
</noinclude>