Talk:Get Smart (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Get Smart (film) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Film Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Future

This article has been rated as Future-Class on the quality scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

Editing Guidelines

Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:

If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films)
When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.

Additional Information:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

1 Fan Reaction POV
2 Headline
3 Dwayne Johnson = The Rock
4 Brooks's involvement
5 Spoilers
6 Marketing

[edit] Fan Reaction POV

The fan reaction section is a big mess - there's only one citation and its for the script. There's absolutely no cite for the claim regarding industry insiders. It's also heavily slanted against the project. While this may be true, there's no cites to back up a largely negative fan reaction. This needs serious work!

[edit] Headline

Headlines. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dwayne Johnson = The Rock

Last I remember, he was credited in films as simply "The Rock". If in his latest film, he's credited as such, then he should be referred to here as "The Rock" too. — mattrobs 06:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

He is credited as “Dwayne Johnson” in the trailer for THIS film. Not “The Rock” or “Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson.” Also, “Dwayne Johnson” is the title of his Wikipedia article. I have edited the article to reflect this. Xargon666x6 16:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brooks's involvement

Does anybody know if Mel Brooks is working on this film in any way, shape or form? Thank you. Tenk you veddy much. --Wack'd ^{Talk to me! • Admire my handiwork!} 19:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spoilers

Is it really necessary to have the cameo roles listed in the article introduction? I'd much rather have been surprised by these cameos in the theater than read them on Wikipedia. At the very least leave it to only the subsequent cast list and have only the main stars listed in the intro. 75.84.153.232 (talk) 10:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Content_Disclaimer 97.102.172.112 (talk) 22:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)