Talk:German Workers' Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. | ||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||||||
|
|||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, an attempt to improve, organise and standardise Wikipedia's articles in the area of politics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low-importance in Politics. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
-Support. There was also a German Workers' Party in Austria-Hungary, German Workers' Party (Austria-Hungary). Maximilian II 21:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I would propose turning this into a dismabig page linking to the Austrian party and the NSDAP and merging the content into the latter. After all, it is one an the same party, not just a predecessor. Str1977 (smile back) 23:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- The NSDAP article is already quite large, so maybe the opposite should happen, move non-essential DAP material from within the NSDAP article into this article? Maximilian II 05:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
It appears to me that this article is the primary topic, is that correct? If so, I oppose the move per disambiguation naming guidelines: "When there is a well known primary meaning for a term or phrase, much more used than any other [...] then that topic may be used for the title of the main article, with a disambiguation link at the top." A German Workers' Party (disambiguation) page can be created if/when there are more than two potentially ambiguous articles. --Muchness 01:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Oppose. There's no need for a disambiguation page when there's only two pages. And since I'd imagine the majority of Wikipedians would assume the same as I would, i.e. that the "German Workers' Party" is a Germany party, I don't think we need to disambiguate further. The current setup, using the {{For}} template at the top of the article, seems the most straightforward solution to me. --DeLarge 16:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. --Stemonitis 16:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Founded by von Sebottendorff in 1918
According to the Rudolf von Sebottendorf article, the party was founded by him in 1918. Consequently, one or the other is wrong. __meco (talk) 12:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
