User:Geo Swan/working/correspondents

• Terrorism
• Talk:Charities accused of ties to terrorism
• Mohammed_Bouyeri hist

• Fair use and image copyright

• He renamed Charities accused of ties to terrorism to Charities tied to terrorism.
  • When I challenged him on this edit he justified this move with WP:NPA
  • He complained that I was harrassing him.
• When I first looked at his contributions I saw some articles that looked interesting, and made some changes
  • Sayed Rahmatullah Hashemi

• An on-again, off-again follower of my work

• During the {afd} for Sabir Mahfouz Lahmar said: "So discuss their treatment (in a neutral way) in the article about the prison, but an article about each one of these non-notable people is only America-bashing."
• Nominated List of Guantanamo Bay detainees for deletion on the grounds of "anti-americanism".
• left a message on my talk page, saying: "Your anti-Americanism is neither acceptable nor appreciated."

1. Removed Sabrina Harman from the [[Category:War Criminals]] -- mocking the idea that she was a war criminal.
2. I tried to engage Getaway in a civil dialogue, pointing out that her role in violations of the Geneva Conventions made her, by definition, a war criminal. Uncivil, obfuscatory, highly confrontational responses from Getaway. Examination of Getaway's recent contributions list reveals that others received similar, highly confrontational, non-negotiatiable announcements from Getaway. In their other confrontational exchanges they complained that other wikipedians were failing WP:AGF -- even though they failed to WP:AGF to me.
3. Getaway removed passages from several Guantanamo detainee articles, claiming they were "irrelevant".
4. I reverted one. But when I noticed they had excised the same passages in all the other Guantanamo detainee articles I had edited that day, I left a request that they refrain from further removals until we had discussed the issue. They haven't replied to this entreaty. But they haven't reverted their edits, and made any attempt to defend themselves. On the other hand they haven't excised the passage from any further Guantanamo detainee article.
5. I think I should give them a week to explain themselves, and, if I get no reply to my civil entreaty, I should feel free to regard their edit as vandalism.

• Epsoul: Torture allegations - Deleted Biased/Unproven/Uncredible Section

[8]