User talk:GaylordHopscotch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ok Guys, you know what to do, let the flaming begin.

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Gwernol 17:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] The Green Berets (film)

I think the article already describes it as a poorly made, ham-handed movie. No need to state that in the opening paragraph. It has to be Wayne's worst movie. --Habap 20:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Editorializing

The sorts of edits you made here and here are no acceptable for Wikipedia. We have a neutral point of view policy- editors can't just go around inserting their personal opinions into articles. Friday (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Piss.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Piss.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Mr. Pitiful (artist)

A tag has been placed on Mr. Pitiful (artist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.