User talk:Gavantredoux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I removed your reference to your book review because of the reasons I have already given. The style is wrong: links to reviews are not added to references in the reference section of articles. See the article on Einstein, for example. Dozens of books in references, not a one linked to a review. Besides, it is a "vanity" link. DonSiano 12:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
You claim in justification that "style" forbids adding a link to a book review in the reference section. Please provide a reference to a WikiPedia style guide advising this - stating that some other entries do not have such links is not persuasive. Regarding the notion of a "vanity" link, please state which WikiPedia guideline is relevant. I see no reason why I cannot link an entry to a review I have written. Why not? If you do not provide substantiation I will declare a dispute and ask for arbitration. Gavantredoux 20:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue III - September 2007
The September 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 01:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summary
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Richard Francis Burton. Thank you. --Slashme 06:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue IV - May 2008
A new May 2008 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is hot off the virtual presses. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss (talk) 23:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
