Talk:Gaucho
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Wardrobe malfunction
The description for chiripá corresponds to gaucho bombachas. I've also added the correct meaning of chiripá.
See DRAE (Dictionary of the Real Academia Española, in Spanish): Chiripá and Pantalón Bombacho
Also in Spanish: Chiripá and Bombachas.
Several sources (for example, the last one above) cite that the bombachas were British imports from Turkey, it is worth mentioning?
Ejrrjs 00:15, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I think it's worth mentioning, I love stuff like that... -- Jmabel | Talk 01:31, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
- Will you add those references to the article or should I? -- Jmabel | Talk 01:33, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
- I'll do it Ejrrjs 08:14, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Done. Here there is another secondary source (in Spanish, 1st paragraph). It would be nice to add the Turkish name for the bombachas. Ejrrjs 11:17, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
[edit] UCSB
Why would anyone reading about gauchos want to know that it happens to be the mascot of UCSB? This seems to me to be appropriate to mention at University of California, Santa Barbara, but not here. -- Jmabel | Talk 20:02, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
- I agree. Ejrrjs | What? 22:07, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I have removed accordingly. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:22, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Why is it appropriate to mention the mascot in the FIFA World Cup, but not at UCSB? Ar57 4 July 2005 09:23 (UTC)
- Because the former is significantly related to Argentina, while the latter is an absolutely arbitrary symbol. But I, personally, wouldn't mind seeing it gone as well.-- Jmabel | Talk July 4, 2005 17:38 (UTC)
- I added a 'Modern Influences' section (mostly to get 'gaucho pants' in without giving the main article too many asides) and now it seemed reasonable to add the UCSB reference back in. Robbyslaughter 15:52, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- Because the former is significantly related to Argentina, while the latter is an absolutely arbitrary symbol. But I, personally, wouldn't mind seeing it gone as well.-- Jmabel | Talk July 4, 2005 17:38 (UTC)
- Why is it appropriate to mention the mascot in the FIFA World Cup, but not at UCSB? Ar57 4 July 2005 09:23 (UTC)
- I have removed accordingly. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:22, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] The gaucho isn't
name for an occupation but is an ethnic group that almost lost today. the word he equivalent to "cowboy" is "peón". The article es:Gaucho has same mistake.
No, you can have gauchos of any ethniticity; e.g. "Los gauchos judíos" (The Jewish Gauchos), a novel by Alberto Gerchunoff.
Ejrrjs | What? 06:34, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- But they were minority in the gaucho siciety, weren't they? --Ypacaraí 13:16, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)
-
- Well, they used to live in their own Colonias, so it depends on where the census is made :-)
- I could also mention the black gauchos, such as the moreno killed by Martín Fierro. My point is: gauchos were either mestizos or criollos (or even black or mulattos) and did not have any specific "racial" distinction from the inhabitants of the cities. Of course they shared a specific culture, which can be still enjoyed on special occasions (such as Heritage Day, November 10th). They were "long distance" herders and that job is not required any longer. Ejrrjs | What? 18:28, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- Uh sorry, I used the word "ethnic" w/o knowing it includes "racial" meaning. Of course I read (translated) "Martin Fierro". I meant in above comment that they shared cultural character, so they shouldn't be considered as some sort of occupation and could be considered as a nation. And this nation was suppressed and mistreated like Jose Hernandez described in "Martin Fierro". Much later, after hordes of european immigrants had shared the pampas safely, the specific culture is now only used as touristic attractions. Isn't it? So I think the difinition in this article isn't correct. --Ypacaraí 03:03, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
- But sharing a cultural character a nation does not make. The first reason is, they didn't even try to do it, so it is a counterfactual statement (see, instead, Rio Grande do Sul, which was an independent Republic for a while). Secondly, a shared culture seems to be a precondition for nation building (Ernst Gellner:Nations and Nationalism, Cornell University Press, 1983) but is not enough (nation of skaters, of surfers, of nerds??) (...to be continued...) Ejrrjs | What? 18:48, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Uh sorry, I used the word "ethnic" w/o knowing it includes "racial" meaning. Of course I read (translated) "Martin Fierro". I meant in above comment that they shared cultural character, so they shouldn't be considered as some sort of occupation and could be considered as a nation. And this nation was suppressed and mistreated like Jose Hernandez described in "Martin Fierro". Much later, after hordes of european immigrants had shared the pampas safely, the specific culture is now only used as touristic attractions. Isn't it? So I think the difinition in this article isn't correct. --Ypacaraí 03:03, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- But I'm using the word "nation" as a group of people sharing same culture, like creole. --Ypacaraí 23:48, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- For me the argentine gauchos are an ethnic group. They have their "own names", their "own music", their "own women" (las chinitas), their own clothing, their own food, their own house styles (ranchos), Etc., I don't think that gauchos are the equivalent for cowboys, it's just for Walt Disney cartoon?.
- The jewish gauchos weren't "gauchos" they were called so for the rural life of them. --Vokoder 20:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DON't SPEAK ABOUT WHAT YOU DONT KNOW
Trying to interpret and understand a culture just by reading books proves to be a constant mistake. Tylor and Frazier today are known to be "arm chair scholars" for just such a falacy.
The above wrote that the traditional way of the Gaúcho is only a Tourist attraction. As a Gaúcho, born in Porto Alegre, RS I find this insulting. To live as a Gaúcho implies an ontology and a cosmology of its own. My traditions live through me. I am not a Paulista ( a person from São Paulo)or a Carioca ( a person from Rio), I am my pride of being Gaúcho, and my pride is who I am.
Do not wright about things you do not know. Don't assume. A couple of months ago, a couple danish cartoonists made the same mistake. Look at the impact.
People don't realize, (are naive in the case of the cartoonist's) the dimension of disrespect they are achieving in making an assumption about a culture.
Ala Púcha Tchê
- So are you going to help work on the article, or just complain? - Jmabel | Talk 01:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- I think this article mainly handles about Gauchos in Argentine and Uruguay, and not referring Gaúchos as nickname of Rio-grandenses. So did I. --Ypacaraí 13:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- I am Gaúcho, and i kind of agree with Jmabel. This is a destructive critic. Instead of complaining ppl should try to make the article better, make CONSTRUCTIVE critics. IMHO the article is a nice try. NOTE (for Ypacaraí and others) the "Gaúcho" culture is in fact a branch or derivation of several cultures that used to live in this area, so YES, Gauchos of Argentina, Uruguay and Brasil do have the same roots, even though the brasilian Gaúcho is the most recognizable and different. -Atriel
[edit] UCSB
I've retained a brief mention of the gaucho being the mascot of UCSB, but cut this longer passage:
Also, the official mascot of the University of California, Santa Barbara. The gaucho itself is only represented by a black, zoro-type mask although there are occasional appearances by the "phantom," an alumn who returns to basketball games to cheer the team on, along with the rowdy (and often intoxicated) pep club, the gaucho locos.
If someone wants to start an article on the gaucho as icon or in popular culture, this (with the spelling fixed) would presumably belong there. - Jmabel | Talk 20:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] How about Santa Catarina
Is well know fact that Santa Catarina, RS neighbour's state, does host some Gaúchos. And also in the Guerra dos Farrapos RS joinned SC and founded República Juliana. I think the article lacks by not citing Gaúchos in Santa Catarina. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.37.94.165 (talk • contribs) 17 January 2007.
- If it is a well-known fact, there should be little difficulty finding citation. - Jmabel | Talk 22:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Etymology
Regarding: "the Arabic chaucho (a type of whip used in herding animals)." While I have no idea if a proposed Arabic origin if Gaucho is correct, I would note that "chaucho" is clearly not an Arabic word at all, although this may be a Iberian deformation of an Arabic word for "a type of whip used in herding animals." The CH (is it "sh" as in French or "ch" as in English, or...) does not exist in Arabic, and the form of the word given looks to be Iberian (Spanish I would guess). This entry should obviously be researched more (although Wikipedia in its typical sloppiness is a great source for naive false etymologies). (collounsbury 17:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC))
[edit] free image
there's a great free image of a gaucho here: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3g12117 140.247.240.181 23:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ronaldinho
In the section "Modern influences", one reads: "Ronaldinho, nicknamed by some as Ronaldinho Gaúcho" but as long as any brazilian I know refers to Ronaldinho as "Ronaldinho gaúcho", I suggest to change the entry to "Ronaldinho, nicknamed in Brazil as Ronaldinho Gaúcho"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustavo Colvero (talk • contribs)
[edit] Mascot's hat
Reading the text I can't find any reference to the origin of the gaucho's hat and the exclusive association of both. As I ain't any specialist in the subject I can't make a straight association of the hat worn by the Texas Tech's mascot (some kind of zorro) and the one commonly worn by the gauchos. So why shouldn't the entry be removed? Moreover one can quickly make confusion between the zorro there and a gaucho. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustavo Colvero (talk • contribs)
[edit] A way of life
I think this article lacks by not emphisizing the gaucho as belonging to a way of life preserved untill today and the association with the term gaucho with cowboy seems erroneous to me, as we have the terms vaqueiro, peão, etc; in portuguese and words like peón and vaquero in spanish. Perhaps it should be explicitly pointed that the gaucho's way of life isn't any touristic show. We can cite, for example the activities of the worldwide Movimento Tradicionalista Gaúcho and the Confederacion Gaucha Argentina and they efforts to keep traditionalism in these days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustavo Colvero (talk • contribs)
[edit] Purpose
Hello again. My final contribution (complain?) for now is to purpose a complete renewing of the article. The new one is intended to have sections differentiating the gaucho as it is in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, etc; sections explaining the gaucho's complete gear, culinary, traditions, festivities, peculiar language, their influence in their country and so on. I think that with a joint effort we can extend this article to a subsection of WikiProject South America. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustavo Colvero (talk • contribs)
[edit] Changes made
As nobody manifested contrary, I'm making some of the changes that I've pointed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustavo Colvero (talk • contribs)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

