User talk:Gashmak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Regarding edits to Jeremy Kyle

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Gashmak! However, your edit here was reverted and is considered vandalism. However, I do see your point :-). Please have a look at WP:NPOV. Regards, Parmesan 14:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits to Loose Women

Warning

Please do not vandalise pages with point-of-view statements, such as this edit. Repeated vandalism will ensure that you are banned from editing for a certain time.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Parmesan 12:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP Policies & British Empire/Ireland

  • WP:V: "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a reliable source, which should be cited in the article. Quotations should also be attributed. If an article topic has no reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. Any edit lacking a source may be removed, but editors may object if you remove material without giving them a chance to provide references."
  • WP:NOR: "Wikipedia is not the place for original research. Citing sources and avoiding original research are inextricably linked: the only way to demonstrate that you are not presenting original research is to cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic of the article, and to adhere to what those sources say."

I am giving you a chance to cite sources, I am not threatening you. Arguing on the basis of "common sense and pure logic" does not satisfy WP's criteria for inclusion in articles. The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick 02:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)