Talk:Gamma Zee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Are we going to get into an argument about notability? Are the two links I gave not reliable sources? This page doesn't contain much information, but it doesn't need to. It is what it is, a small page with a little bit of relevant information documenting a game that is evidently in a number of peoples' memory. Compare to Captain Magneto and Crystal Quest. I vote to keep. Cazort (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability is established by coverage in reliable sources with a reputation for editorial control, which neither of those links appears to be. If you could cite, for example, reviews of the game in computer magazines, that would be a good way to establish notability. Otherwise, this is unlikely to survive a deletion debate. Toohool (talk) 02:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pf.

All knowledge is notable. This particular game had an impact on some people, somewhere-- just because it didn't make it onto the top fold of the New York Times doesn't mean it isn't notable. But what do I know? I just tend to think that it's not fair for Wikipedia to consider itself an impartial and 'free' source of knowledge if it only allows certain things to be written in it. Lequis (talk) 04:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)