Talk:Gaetano Bedini
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
Gaetano Bedini has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 |
WikiProject Echo has identified Gaetano Bedini as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the Italian language Wikipedia. |
This articles look to have been posted as an automatic translation by some IP little intelligent user. I wikified the first part, and removed a bunc of final stuff of little interest. Please help for the rest, this matter is boring and I want to do other most interesting tasks. Bye. --Attilios 21:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- No, i have write this article with my low english ;) I'd like, someone clean up the voice .. it's no difficolut! PS why have removed "Episcopal genealogy" and "Episcopal Succession"? --Genovese 07:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Disagreement
I would like to draw community’s attention to the situation with Gaetano Bedini article. User:Attilios held hostage this article and RB all new edit. This are diff [1] [2]. He say my edit are "unrelevant" :°( - He removed 2 photo too. Photo are unrelevant? --87.1.223.176 15:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- That's not taking it in hostage. If you added thing related to his life, it'd be good. I put out the Cathedral of Viterbo photo just 'cause there was no room for it. Do you think that the endless series of successors of Bedini can have a place in his article? Isn't it more relevant to Archbishop of... etc. articles? Why don't you concentrate on the childish English used in the rest of the article? --Attilios 18:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I came here based on the thread started at WP:AN/I. first, Attilios, insulting an editor who seems to be acting in good faith with mockery of his grasp of what's probably a foriegn language is a gross violation of WP:CIVIL. Second, Although I agree that the long lsit is irrelevant, it seems that he's added a large amount of reasonable information which you could be workign on better integratign to the article, instead of merely removing. I ask you now to reconsider your attitude towards the page, because as I read the history, you're developing OWNership issues. Thank you. ThuranX 23:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds like you've been made aware, based on your reply at my user talk. However, comparisons of article sizes aren't good barometers, since sometimes a less important person happens to have more available sources for attribution, allowing for a bigger article. Example, a guy might be notable for a 20 year career as a spokesman, and for his career as an elected official. Because his body of work before holding office was so public, it might be easy to fill out his page with earlier info. ThuranX 23:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
