Talk:Futurist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. |
| B | rated as b-Class on the assessment scale |
| Mid | rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale |
Should this be a redirect to Futurism or Future Studies? It seems like most of this can be covered in the latter article. --Doug (talk) 15:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Futurists adapt and apply the protocols and practices described by other articles cited above.
- geoWIZard-Passports 23:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Is that a "yes"? My vote is for yes, redirect this page. Sancho McCann 10:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bias
It is unusual, and not best practices, for one individual to promote his or here organisation and use his or her definitions for an article at Wikipedia.
I do not know John Smart, but he is apparently promoting his own organisation.
David E. Doyle 20:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Deleted another blog article. Rather pointless to add them as there are many out there and they can be found via google.com or and other search engine.
-UB
[edit] Scientific forecasting?
Is this the right article to discuss people involved in scientific forecasting? J. Scott Armstrong is a leader in scientific forecasting and there are number of others writing peer reviewed journal articles on the subject. RonCram 17:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Contemporary Futurists
The list is relatively short. Why Laurie Anderson and not Natasha Vita-More? Anderson is cool but not a futurist. Vita-More is a known futurist. I'm new here but I'd like to suggest Vita-More. I just heard her speak in the UK and she was scholarly and smart. Thoughts? Videogamexx (talk) 20:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
