Talk:Fundamental Laws of England

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] New Discussion

This is a nice page. Have edited it to reflect my contribution to wikipedia of the Thoburn v Sunderland City Council Case and have used the nicley pre-typed judgment in the Thoburn case from this page, thank you. Will 13:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Old discussion from vfd

Article kept on April 18, 2004

• nonsence, ping
• Agree, total nonsense. Delete -- Graham :) | Talk 16:01, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete -- Cyrius|&#9998 16:43, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Everyking 20:52, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. --Stormie 23:52, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. --Marnanel 01:38, Apr 10, 2004 (UTC)
• fundamental nonsense. Exploding Boy 02:04, Apr 10, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect to British constitutional law -- Smerdis of Tlön 02:06, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Stupid prank. Cribcage 22:02, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. This is total crap. Jacob1207 23:07, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete; nonsense. —Psychonaut 16:31, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, and add to Wikipedia:Pages needing attention. Often referred to in English legal history. -- Zigger 17:15, 2004 Apr 16 (UTC)
• Delete. Fundamentally flawed. Pteron 20:38, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Total nonsense. Arwel 12:07, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

---

• Wrote a new article on the topic - please revisit. -- Zigger 20:15, 2004 Apr 17 (UTC)
  • No longer nonsense, keep -- Cyrius|&#9998 20:24, Apr 17, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. 185 Google hits, in keeping with the new article. -- The Anome 20:28, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Much better in its new form. Keep. Arwel 20:53, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

---

[edit] Merge

Isn't half of this just repeating the UK constitution article? Francium12 (talk) 05:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)